More apocryphal alarms

 More apocryphal alarms


Women who accept a screening mammogram every added year are essentially beneath acceptable than those who opt for anniversary screening to acquaintance false-positive after-effects and biopsies that about-face out to be unnecessary, according to a new abstraction adjourned by the National Blight Institute.

Using abstracts from a civic arrangement of breast-cancer registries, advisers analyzed added than 386,000 mammograms from about 170,000 women who began accepting the breast X-rays amid 1994 and 2006.

Over 10 years of screening, the abstraction estimates, 61% of women who accept anniversary mammograms and 42% of women who accept biennial mammograms will be alleged aback at atomic already for a aftereffect analysis that reveals they do not in actuality accept cancer.

The anticipation of accepting an accidental biopsy is analogously college with anniversary screening. Depending on the age at which they activate screening, 7% to 9% of women who accept anniversary mammograms and 5% to 6% of those who accept biennial mammograms will accept accidental biopsies over a 10-year period, according to the study, which appears this anniversary in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Health.com: 25 breast blight belief busted
Annual mammograms were not actually added able than biennial screening at anecdotic alarming late-stage cancers, although a hardly college allotment of women in the biennial accumulation did advance these cancers.

The advisers caution, however, that the baby amount of women in the abstraction who accustomed a analysis of invasive breast blight (4,492) prevents them from cartoon close abstracts about the capability of one screening agenda over another. A beyond abstraction will be bare to assay that point, they say.

The allegation don't appearance that biennial screening is bigger than anniversary screening, or carnality versa, but rather that apocryphal positives -- a antecedent of all-overs for abounding women -- are accepted and "part of the action of screening mammography," says advance researcher Rebecca Hubbard, Ph.D., an abettor investigator at the Accumulation Bloom Analysis Institute, the analysis arm of a nonprofit bloom plan in Seattle.

"I don't anticipate there is any one appropriate answer," Hubbard says. "I anticipate it's a claimed accommodation area every alone woman has to anticipate about what is her accident tolerance, how would she handle a apocryphal positive, and her own claimed breast blight risk."

Health.com: How to cut your breast blight accident at any age
Doctors and advisers accept been debating the pros and cons of anniversary mammograms for years, but the catechism has taken on added coercion aback 2009, if a federal advising accumulation recommended that a lot of women accept mammograms every added year alpha at age 50, rather than every year alpha at age 40.

The group, accepted as the United States Preventive Services Assignment Force, appropriate that screening decisions should be based on a woman's alone accident as able-bodied as her "values" apropos the abeyant allowances and harms of added accepted screening.

Laura Esserman, M.D., the administrator of the breast affliction centermost at the University of California, San Francisco, says the new abstraction validates the assignment force's advocacy and "confirms that biennial screening is the best way to go." (Esserman was complex in neither the assignment force nor the study.)

The added accident of avant-garde blight associated with biennial as against to anniversary screening is "so tiny that [it's] not even relevant," Esserman says. Mammography is primarily advantageous for communicable slow-growing cancers, she says, while fast-growing cancers -- which are added accepted a part of adolescent women, and tend to could cause a apparent accumulation in the breast -- abound so bound that even anniversary mammograms could absence them.

Health.com: Fighting the blight a mammogram can't catch
But Daniel B. Kopans, M.D., a assistant of radiology at Harvard Medical School, in Boston, says the implications of the abstraction are not so clear-cut. Studies like this one that assay ample amounts of anthology abstracts accept assertive inherent limitations, even if mitigating factors such as age and ancestors history of blight are taken into account, he says.

Unlike studies in which women are about assigned to accept either anniversary or biennial screening, the adjustment acclimated by Hubbard and her colleagues can't aphorism out the achievability that the women who chose to get anniversary mammograms are altered from their aeon in anonymous means that may accept skewed the findings, Kopans says.

"The acumen that oncologists accept not been calling for a abeyance to anniversary screening alpha at the age of 40 is because they apperceive able-bodied that the best way for their therapies to cure breast blight is to acquisition it early," Kopans says. "It is, probably, not a acceptable abstraction to set the alarm aback by addition the screening interval."

Health.com: How to advice a admired one cope with breast cancer

The abstraction has some important shortcomings. For instance, almost few of the women completed a abounding decade of anniversary or biennial mammograms, so the advisers had to resort to statistical clay to appraisal the 10-year anticipation of apocryphal positives and accidental biopsies. And a lot of of the mammograms included in the abstraction were acceptable film-screen mammograms, not the agenda mammograms now in boundless use.

It's not bright how the change in technology ability affect the appliance of the findings. In addition abstraction in the aforementioned affair of the journal, Hubbard and her colleagues compared agenda and blur mammography. Both techniques were analogously effective, they found, although agenda mammography was bigger at anecdotic tumors in acutely close breast tissue and estrogen receptor abrogating tumors, both of which are added accepted a part of women in their 40s.

Hubbard stresses that the greater likelihood of apocryphal positives associated with added accepted mammograms shouldn't dissuade women from accepting the tests altogether. "It's absolutely important that women are accepting screened, and that affair or all-overs about apocryphal absolute after-effects doesn't become a barrier for participating," she says.


source : cnn.com